Talk:Lama (genus)

Content somewhat archaic
This article appears to have started with content copied from a source that is a century or more old (e.g., it mentioned the theory of evolution as though it was a recent development), and thus some of the language and content is a bit archaic. Some of this same content is present in the Llama article. WolfmanSF 06:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I can't for the life of me understand this sentence:

Once thought to be related to Jacinta, reports now suggest Jacinta married one

Baskaxy (talk) 10:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Chilihueque
It seems the separateness of the Chilihueque is hypothetical at best, and it should be merged here. Furthermore, it does not have a binomial, so can note featured in the taxobox. FunkMonk (talk) 11:53, 13 February 2013 (UTC)