Talk:Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well written, in accordance with MoS for science articles. Although I have limited knowledge of medicine and biochemistry, I  could follow the article.
 * IVIG (end of treatment section)needed explanation, I added a wikilink and the acronym. I also consolidated some stray sentences.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References appear fine, RS, no OR. I assume good faith for sources which I cannot access.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Appears to cover the subject well.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Captioned and tagged correctly
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this is good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this is good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)