Talk:Lancaster Canal

Assessment
I'm not sure this rates B-class, there is a lot of uncited material (and this is flagged on the article page) which if inserted would merit B but for the moment I think it's C only. NtheP (talk) 09:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * rectified. NtheP (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Bridge images
A Geograph user has pictures of the canal's bridges 14 to 32. Would it be overkill to put them all in a gallery in the article? - Dudesleeper / Talk  16:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes it would be, I think. One or two representative pictures of bridges, embedded in the article text, is sufficient for illustrative purposes (see Images. What you could do, however, is upload them to Wikimedia Commons, create a gallery or category there, and link it from the article. The templates commons, commonscat or commonsimages can be used for this purpose. --Blisco (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Aqueduct restoration
The article says "…Lune Aqueduct was scheduled for a £2,000,000 facelift in 2009/10 …the work is not now expected to be completed until 2015." and British Waterways says "The Lune Aqueduct, which has recently benefited from a £2.4 million transformation" SandJ-on-WP (talk) 05:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * UK-Motorway-icon.svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * UK-Motorway-icon.svg