Talk:Landis's Missouri Battery/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 19:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this dreckly. Harrias talk 19:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Prose
 * "..Landis's Battery, as well as Guibor's Battery participated.." Needs a comma after "Guibor's Battery".
 * Done
 * "The Confederates surrender Vicksburg.." This should be "surrendered".
 * Fixed
 * "..and order to Demopolis, Alabama." Similarly, this should be "ordered".
 * Went with "were ordered"


 * Layout
 * Add a short description.
 * Done
 * MOS:NOTES suggests that References should come before Sources.
 * Done


 * Sourcing
 * All to reliable sources, following a consistent citation format.


 * Images
 * Appropriately captioned and licensed.
 * Consider adding alt text.
 * Done

Overall a nice, neat article with very little wrong with it. Harrias talk 10:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * - I've replied to all points so far. Do you think this one is ready for an ACR?  I know it's a bit short, but there's not a whole lot to say here. Hog Farm (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Passing this as a GA. With regards to ACR, I think the only questions I would have (and I genuinely don't know the answer, but you probably do):
 * Can this article, despite its size, be considered comprehensive?
 * Does this article omit any significant sources that might discuss the subject?
 * If you are happy that neither of those points will be an issue, then I can't really see what criteria-based opposition there can be. (But no promises!) Harrias  talk 20:31, 4 June 2020 (UTC)