Talk:Landmarks of Omaha, Nebraska

Landmarks
This page defines places that the city designates as a landmark, so I think that either the title of this article should change, or the places should be reconciled with this site (after which this site would become the main reference for the page). Does this sound right? Which should we do? Best, Smmurphy(Talk) 00:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Requested move
The title of this article should be redirected to Landmarks in Omaha, Nebraska, and the contents should be left here. The newer page follows common naming conventions; this one does not. – Freechild (Hey ya. | edits) 16:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Re-insert template
If this page must exist, then Template:NRHP Omaha adds a useful way to make many of these items in this list useful. I would rather this list be Landmarks in Omaha, Nebraska (see move request above. – Freechild (Hey ya. | edits) 04:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Landmarks and registered places are two different classes of objects. If the items are landmarks then they would be listed and the template would be a duplicate entry.  If they are not landmarks, then the template would be listing an item that does not belong.  Given the fact that the category is included in the see also, there are three ways that some of these articles are listed from this page.  That is simply overkill and unnecessary.  Personally I'd leave the landmarks to a category and add the items when the articles appear.  I don't see a need for a list of landmarks since they are not clearly defined anywhere.  Vegaswikian 21:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)