Talk:Landsat 1/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 20:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Reviewing later.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 20:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref 9 is dead.
 * ✅ Found an archived version.
 * Use consistent dates for citations.
 * ✅ Done (found a couple in the infobox too)
 * Third paragraph needs referencing.
 * ✅ Finally found the citation for this, not sure why I couldn't find it quicker.  Kees08  (Talk)  
 * Ref 8 seems like a WP:SPS. Are there any better sources?
 * In the spaceflight industry, Astronautix is considered a WP:RS, and falls under this: Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. from WP:SPS. A quick Google search shows several books that cite the website. We used it pretty extensively in our spacecraft design classes too, for what its worth :).

That should be it.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 21:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Done! Let me know if there is anything else you want me to change.  Kees08  (Talk)   05:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)