Talk:Langley, British Columbia (city)

Elections
What does it mean to say that Langley City is "the key component" of the electoral district of the same name? Geographically speaking they are not the same thing, and Langley Township has a much higher (i.e. more electorally significant) population. I've changed "the key component" to "a key component" as I believe it is more accurate. DoctorElmo 01:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: pages not moved. No consensus for move at this time.  Mini  apolis  13:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

– Because Langley City and Langley Township are geographically adjacent, they are quite often referred to as such; a simple Google Books or Google Scholar search demonstrates the usage. The article titles as they currently stand are both unsightly and confusing; it is difficult for an uninitiated person to determine whether it is Langley or British Columbia to which the parenthetical disambiguator refers. Furthermore, our policy on how to decide on an article title states that conciseness should be sought after; "Langley City" is much more concise than "Langley, British Columbia (city)". Neelix (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Langley, British Columbia (city) → Langley City
 * Langley, British Columbia (district municipality) → Langley Township
 * Comment shouldn't Langley, British Columbia be reformatted into an article on the metropolitan area comprising both Langley's then? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 04:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment if it isn't moved, then both should exist as redirects. And Langley city as does. As well as Langley (city) and Langley (township) -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment What of and  ? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I support the idea to merge the pages . I think that the page content should be carefully merged. I have made some large contributions to the Langley, British Columbia (district municipality) page, and while working on it it seemed silly to have to avoid mentioning the City of Langley as it is basically one of the neighbourhoods, but with it's own separate governance. I think the Langley, British Columbia (district municipality) page should be used as a base with the City information added to it as a neighbourhood. People never distinguish between the township and city in daily conversation. This proposed renaming does nothing to rectify that. James.bc (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment the problem with that is that people talk about North Van in one breath too, referring to either city or municipality......and people refer to Saanich and Colwood and Langford and Oak Bay as being "Victoria" also......each municipality gets its own article around here; if agglomerations were the format for articles, then West Kelowna's article should include Tspentikum 11 or whatever the big IR is within it that has all the non-native residents, and Lillooet's article should be merged with the three Indian bands/reserves who it's at the centre of, and so on.....Skookum1 (talk) 02:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I am not too familiar with the interactions of City and District Municipalities of other places you mentioned, however I think it's important to emphasize that that Langley has a shared urban-core area which makes the separation indistinguishable to people unfamiliar to the area. Langley City is quite small and doesn't cover the entire city core, making it more like a neighbourhood, compared to North Vancouver where the city area almost completely covers the urban centre. I just think the separate articles does not benefit the presentation of the information in this case, however your point is still valid and does present problems in the context of other city articles in the region. James.bc (talk) 05:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm from the Fraser Valley; "Langley" can mean anywhere between the Surrey and Abbotsford boundaries south of the river; if we're talking about the City of Langley, "is it in Langley City" is the way it gets put; but nobody says "is it in the Township?" or "is it in Langley Township"....the generic phrase "is it in the City" would mean Vancouver, or points west of Surrey anyway, unless you were specifically talking about municipal affairs, e.g. where your property is. BTW similar dabs existing North Vancouver (city) and North Vancouver (district municipality);  And NB as with Delta being "the Corporation of Delta" and the term "Township of Langley", these have the same status as district municipalities but.....well, aren't.  I think there's another Township in BC, too, can't recall.  Using "City of Langley" would necessarily imply other incorporated cities should be titled the same way (starting with the City of North Vancouver)....myself I thought things were OK just the way they are; more productive than nomenclature-chess I'd say improving the articles would be a better waste of time.Skookum1 (talk) 15:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * British Columbia's other township is Spallumcheen.  TB randley  04:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It might be that Spallumcheen, British Columbia (township) may be appropriate, likewise Langley, British Columbia (township); In listings of municipalities the type of municipality can matter e.g. Sun Peaks and Jumbo Glacier are "mountain resort municipalites", Whistler is a "resort municipality", Northern Rockies is a "regional municipality". I'm not sure of the origins of the Township designation, but Spallumcheen is a very old incorporation like Langley; there may have been others on the Island that were townships whose status or nomenclature has changed; now governed by the same Act, there may be a technical difference...."Langley (township)" is more accurate, than "Langley (district municipality)" is what I'm saying.Skookum1 (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose, use official names per MOS:CA. 117Avenue (talk) 00:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * "City of Langley" is the official name: Neelix (talk) 04:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment but "Corporation of Delta" and "District of Lillooet" are official names too, as is "City of Vancouver" etc......."City of Langley" would be an anomaly unless all other munis with disambig issues were dealt with the same way......Skookum1 (talk) 08:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Skookum1 (talk) 04:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I think other similar articles should be dealt with the same way; "District of x" or "City of x" is a much cleaner manner of disambiguation than what we're currently using. Neelix (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose per general naming convention at MOS:CA.  TB randley  02:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose as noted in my comment there is a parallel case for North Vancouver....my only exception here is a technicality, that Langley, British Columbia (township) is preferable to "district municipality" but the equivalent Delta, British Columbia (corporation) would be misleading....leave 'em as they are.Skookum1 (talk) 02:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Langley, British Columbia (city). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008010226/http://www.city.langley.bc.ca/index.php/discover-langley/history-of-langley to http://city.langley.bc.ca/index.php/discover-langley/history-of-langley
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515120042/http://www.city.langley.bc.ca/index.php/recreation-and-community/parks-and-trails to http://www.city.langley.bc.ca/index.php/recreation-and-community/parks-and-trails
 * Added tag to http://city.langley.bc.ca/images/Brochures/community_profile_2009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:49, 16 December 2017 (UTC)