Talk:Lantian Man/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SilverTiger12 (talk · contribs) 19:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Greetings. I have little experience at GAN so this may not be considered enough to pass it, but I will do my best.

Nitpicking

 * "characteristic of the Acheulean industry which is usually" comma after Acheulean? It reads a little oddly without one.
 * done  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 20:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * It was formally described by Chinese palaeoanthropologist Woo Ju-Kan" Maybe say "The fossil was...", as the immediately preceding sentence is about the location, not the fossil.
 * done  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 20:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "Chenchiawo yielded the dhole,..." Yielded is rather odd phrasing here.
 * features?
 * That works.


 * "In 2018, Zhu and colleagues reported stone tools 2.1 million years ago at the Shangchen site" Surely they did not report stone tools 2.1 millions years ago... maybe change to 2.1 million years old?
 * done  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 21:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "Lantian Man is a spectacle for the Shaanxi History Museum." This changes from past tense (in the previous part of the sentence) to present tense, which reads very strangely. Maybe change to "was a spectacle".
 * that would imply it's not there anymore  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 21:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Is there a way to say that it's still there without changing tenses, though? I.e. "it became a spectacle at the Shaanxi History Museum."
 * done  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 02:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

GA Critereon

 * Verifiable - yes, and all the sources look suitable.
 * Well-written - see nitpicks Yes.
 * Coverage - yes, it covers the whole of the topic.
 * NPOV - yes.
 * Images - copyright looks fine.


 * Support from me. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 03:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * See WP:GAN/I  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 12:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not exactly an experienced reviewer, is it okay for me to just pass it? --SilverTiger12 (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess I just pass it, then. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 19:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)