Talk:Lara Croft Go

Extra dev sources
Though I think the section is fine as is


 * http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/253391/Lara_Croft_Go_dev_Remake_how_you_felt_playing_a_classic_game_not_the_game_itself.php
 * http://madewith.unity.com/stories/making-lara-croft-go
 * http://www.windowscentral.com/lara-croft-go-developer-interview (interview)
 * http://www.tombraiderhq.com/features/2015-10-07-Lara-Croft-GO-Fansite-QA (interview)

czar 03:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Reception/Legacy

czar 04:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * http://thenextweb.com/apps/2015/12/23/50-best-ios-apps-of-2015/3/

New source to add for PS4 dev: http://www.usgamer.net/articles/lara-croft-go-ps4-interview czar  09:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Parentheses?
Hi ,

Any reason why parentheses should be used instead of the word "of"? I haven't seen reception sections written like that, but I wouldn't know what guideline to point to. Soetermans. T / C 00:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , it's a stylistic choice and it hasn't been an issue before—there's no guideline for or against it. In this case, I think it reads better than "X of Y" while giving the information the reader needs. czar  18:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Fair enough ! Not too sound winey, but could you elaborate in your edit summary next time? If someone undoes an edit of mine, especially another experienced editor like yourself, I think that I've made a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soetermans (talk) 22:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Apologies—would have written more if I knew what more to say (thought of it as more BRD than anything) czar  23:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey, it's fine, I'm glad it's just a personal preference and not a mistake on my part. --Soetermans. T / C 15:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)