Talk:Laramans/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * This article passes GA status - well written, almost no edits or changes needed. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" ! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute !           | Review Comment
 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * colspan="3" | 1. :


 * Prose is remarkably clear. Good writing. Made a few minor tweaks myself. Pass.


 * Pass, no issues.
 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * colspan="3" | 2. :


 * Citations are good - well referenced, clear attribution to academic sources.


 * Largely academic sources, some reliable news and other sources. Pass.


 * Pass, no notable issues.


 * Pass - no issues found.
 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * colspan="3" | 3. :


 * Pass, no other major things found.


 * Pass, level of detail is good.


 * Potentially controversial topic - reliance on reliable academic sources and clear attribution. Pass.


 * Pass, no issues.
 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * colspan="3" | 6. :


 * Pass, no issues found.


 * Images are frequent and well-chosen/captioned.