Talk:Large-group awareness training/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

In order to uphold the quality of Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of February 14, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.


 * A significant amount of this article appears to depend on an unpublished Master's thesis which is no longer available, ref #4.


 * There are five unaddressed requests for citation, dating back to November 2007.


 * The evolution of LGAT-providers section is flagged with what appears to be a valid request for self-published sources to be replaced with reliable third-party sources, and has been since March 2008.


 * General textbooks such as Introduction to Psychology are not suitable sources for an encyclopedia article. "Tertiary sources such as compendia, encyclopedias, textbooks, and other summarizing sources may be used to give overviews or summaries, but should not be used in place of secondary sources for detailed discussion", as per No original research

--Malleus Fatuorum 17:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)