Talk:Largest mammals

Orphaned references in Largest mammals
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Largest mammals's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "adw": From Dromedary: Animal Diversity Web: Camelus dromedarius From Primate:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Deorphaning
I changed this from list format to sections, because that makes it easier to navigate the article. Some large walls of text need to be broken up into smaller paragraphs. I also came across many sentences that are not complete sentences. Much of the article is terse and hard to read, and some of them didn't make sense to me.

In the deorphaning process, I have added links from the pages of the animals listed in the first 4 sections, except for the following:


 * "Koala (Phascolaractos cinerus) 14 kg (31 lb) for a large southern male, to about 5 kg (11 lb)." I cannot make sense of this English sentence, and I'm not sure how this makes the Koala the largest anything. The article on Koala didn't help.


 * Under even-toed ungulates, there are several largest bovids listed (water buffalo, gaur, american bison, european bison, domestic cattle, and musk ox). It seems that most bovids are the largest bovid. From the information in this article, it seems that the wild water buffalo is the actual largest. But I don't know enough about these animals to make a judgement call (and there are so many numbers in that big wall of text, that I couldn't follow it), so i didn't add links from them either, until it can be figured out which ones is the largest anything.


 * In the same section, "the largest pig" is about a specific pig from a specific breed of pig, not a type of pig in general, whereas all of the other animals in this article follow the format of "largest species in its order or family", not "largest specimin in breed" and the domestic pig is definitely not the largest species of pig overall (the Giant Forest Hog might be the largest pig species).

I have now gotten bored for the day (haven't added links from anything in the carnivore or later sections yet.) The article is no longer an orphan -- it has more than 3 links -- but it probably should have links from the other animals, not just the first 4 sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pthalo (talk • contribs) 21:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Largest mammals
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Largest mammals's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Wood": From Brown bear:  From Human:  From Polar bear:  From Moose: Wood, The Guinness Book of Animal Facts and Feats. Sterling Pub Co Inc (1983), ISBN 978-0-85112-235-9 

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Largest mammals
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Largest mammals's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Animal":<ul> <li>From Polar bear: </li> <li>From Jaguar: </li> </ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:54, 14 April 2013 (UTC)