Talk:Larisa Iordache/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 18:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

I note there is a previous PR: Peer review/Larisa Iordache/archive1. Could I ask if all the points were addressed?

Regardless, really amazing article - quite well researched, excellent density of citations.
 * date of birth requires a reliable source, otherwise it is a violation of WP:DOB
 * quotes should be prefaced by context. So for instance, there is a quote about Câmpeanu-Silişteanu noticing her speed, but to connect this quote we need to state more explicitly to the previous point.

I will address each GA point:
 * 1) Well written
 * 2) * prose is clear and understandable. It does not flow as easily as an FA grade article, but I may be able to help with that.
 * 3) * the structure is excellent, lead section is three paragraphs long which is on the border of the ecessive length, but I think it is acceptable. I see no problematic phrases.
 * 4) Verifiable and NOR
 * 5) * I cannot see any original research
 * 6) * referencing seems excellent
 * 7) * I am not a domain expert, so it is somewhat hard for me to comment on the quality of the linked news articles. Also, I don’t speak Romanian.
 * 8) Coverage
 * 9) * Seems to cover the life of the subject well, good table summary of achievements
 * 10) * does not diverge from the topic
 * 11) Neutrality
 * 12) * the use of quotes potentially needs some contextualising, this is a minor issue and perhaps my own personal bug bear; otherwise it is quite neutral in tone
 * 13) Stability
 * 14) * seems fine
 * 15) Illustrated
 * 16) * use of images is excellent, well done

Hope this is helpful! Excellent work from the contributor(s). - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 18:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Response
Hi @Aussie Article Writer, thanks for reviewing!


 * I note there is a previous PR: Peer review/Larisa Iordache/archive1. Could I ask if all the points were addressed? Yes, they were back when the review was done in 2014.
 * date of birth requires a reliable source, otherwise it is a violation of WP:DOB. ✅
 * quotes should be prefaced by context. So for instance, there is a quote about Câmpeanu-Silişteanu noticing her speed, but to connect this quote we need to state more explicitly to the previous point. ✅ I added more context to the quotes throughout the article, but if you think it's not enough, let me know

Thank you! -Riley1012 (talk) 18:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * well done, this os now categorised as a GA. I left you a message in your talk page for a further suggestion, but not one that affects GA status. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 23:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)