Talk:Las Limas Monument 1

Unclear description
Quote: "It was "probably" carved during the Middle Formative Period, some time between 1000 to 600 BCE,[5]."

Was it "probably carved" or "carved, probably during the Middle Formative Period"?

Can anybody with access to the reference please clarify?

Many thanks, Pstuart84 Talk 17:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd say the latter interpretation is meant ("carved, probably during the Middle Formative Period"). Though I'm not sure why probably is in quotation marks in the text- is it a quote from the cite, or are the quote marks used to indicate some doubt? Friend Madman, pls clarify...--cjllw | TALK  07:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The quotes were in place because I was quoting an authority, but I can see now that that was not the best construction. The word "probably" does refer to the timeframe, but I believe that the phrase "carved, probably during the Middle Formative Period" is a bit strange since these mounuments are always carved.  I suppose I could use "created" instead of "carved".  You all are welcome, as always, to change anything and everything. Thanks for your comments, Madman 12:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Las Limas Monument 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070317220813/http://swadesh.unam.mx/actualidades/Actualidades/10/texto10/limas.html to http://swadesh.unam.mx/actualidades/Actualidades/10/texto10/limas.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)