Talk:Lathrop House (Vassar College)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 20:49, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * Duplication Detector run on all online sourcing found no copyvio, no close paraphrasing.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * No lists in the article.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Nominator has been the primary editor. Only 3 minor edits by other editors since creation of the article.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Only one image used in the article, and it is appropriately sourced on Commons.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Image is appropriately captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Slam-dunk! Part of a series of articles on Vassar College architecture. Well done.— Maile (talk) 21:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Only one image used in the article, and it is appropriately sourced on Commons.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Image is appropriately captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Slam-dunk! Part of a series of articles on Vassar College architecture. Well done.— Maile (talk) 21:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)