Talk:Launceston Castle/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

I will review this one over the next few days. Comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 08:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Have started reviewing. More to follow. Zawed (talk) 04:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ISBN for the Herring & Gillard ref?
 * Deadlink for "launcestonthen.co.uk" ref, remaining weblinks check out OK
 * No dupe links
 * No DABs
 * Image licences check out OK

Thanks Zawed, Hchc2009 (talk) 08:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Herring and Gillard doesn't have one, unfortunately.
 * Deadlink updated.

Have gone through the text (apologies for the length of time it has taken to me to get to this), and made the odd change. Just a couple of things:

Lead 17th–18th centuries Everything else looks great. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 03:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * "...packed within its bailey's walls." This wording doesn't seem to flow well to me. Perhaps rephrase to "packed within the walls of its bailey."
 * Philip Piper: is the spelling of the surname correct? I assume Hugh Pyper is a descendant?
 * just a ping in case you missed my follow up comments regarding the text. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Oops, missed them! "packed" fixed as proposed. Philip Piper is as per the source; I think Pyper has to be a descendant, with the usual changes of spelling you get in this period, but the sources don't actually say this, and we'd be into OR unfortunately. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, that's fine. The article looks good and I believe it meets all the GA criteria: it broadly covers the subject, is well written in a neutral tone and appropriately cited and illustrated. Passing as a GA now. Great work! Zawed (talk) 06:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)