Talk:Laurent Eketebi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 06:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Punctuation needs work - lots of missing commas, but this is not part of the criteria
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Well references with several books and other sources. Copyvio detector showed up nothing
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Whilst the article doesn’t cover everything in detail, it covers the main aspects and is continually focused on the subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Lacking important images but not a reason to fail
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Needs a little bit of work with punctuation, but good in quality and well referenced. Well done
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Needs a little bit of work with punctuation, but good in quality and well referenced. Well done