Talk:Law for Prevention of Damage to State of Israel through Boycott

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Law for Prevention of Damage to State of Israel through Boycott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120709074415/http://inewp.com/?tag=law-for-prevention-of-damage-to-the-state-of-israel-through-boycott to http://inewp.com/?tag=law-for-prevention-of-damage-to-the-state-of-israel-through-boycott
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120713023253/http://inewp.com/ to http://inewp.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

What?
How was it criticized for being unconstitutional if Israel doesn't have a constitutional? ShimonChai (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

OR and use of PRIMARY sources
ahmm, you blanket reverted a version using your WP:OR citing a WP:PRIMARY court ruling. There is no support in the reliable secondary sources, I can see, to call this routine challenge and ruling a landmark ruling. Worse, your OR, contradicts sources that say the law was mostly upheld, save for one clause.Icewhiz (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what your point is. I left your version of no primary sources in the lede intact. But whenever the supreme court of a jurisdiction strikes down a law, it is—by definition—a landmark case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 13zmz13 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Find a source for that. In Israel many would say it has become MILL for the high court to intervene.Icewhiz (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It satisfies our definition of a landmark case, but if no reliable sources call it that we can't either. I don't think it really matters. Zerotalk 13:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Results of the Lawsuit
I inserted a mention of the the activists saying they wouldn't pay, but haven't found any articles discussing whether the case ever got any traction in New Zealand.Hamster Drink (talk) 08:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)