Talk:Law library

Changing article titles
I'm too new to editing to do this, but changing this article name to U.S. Law Libraries (rather than simply Law Library or American Law Libraries) isn't a bad thing, is it? To make it more than US-based would need input from law librarians around the world, which is not out of the question and I can do some outreach, but are there other or preferred Wikipedia options to consider before changing an article name?

More New Wikipedia editor comments
I've probably kept the US bias in the opening paragraphs. I would need help from foreign law librarians in order to change that. I could then move specific US law libraries info to the United States section. I'm also a work in progress. Onward! Onepersononevote (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

New Wikipedia editor comments
Suggestions and tips welcome. I added details to first paragraph. Also, and I can post this question to Tearoom, do I also need to enter an Edit Summary on this Talk page? Seems redundant, but I have much to learn. Thanks! Onward Onepersononevote (talk) 18:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Untitled
very biased towards america - this isn't a bad thing, just more stuff needs to be added. somebody from another country should write about their countries. Saccerzd 19:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Also very biased toward academic law libraries -- ignores the wide variety of other types of law library such as law firm and court libraries.--Sweet byrd (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I've recently done a bit of expanding on the Special library article and added a sub section which could be expanded to discuss law libraries in general. If that subsection were to be expanded, it could link to this article which could be re-named "American Law Libraries" to reflect it's geographical bias. Just a thought. Either way, if someone could help expanding the "Law Libraries" sub section under Special library it would be much appreciated. Murasaki.suki (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

I've just added a link to the Palm Beach County Law Library. At the Lee County Law Library, which I currently work for, we do not have a website. I hope that in the near future the Board of Trustees will see the importance of having a website and keeping up with the ever changing, fast paced world we live in. Guyatri (talk) 01:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Is the plan to add a link to every law library in the world or only a selection of them? -Thibbs (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Its totally biased towards the US infact...
...I mean this is the English wikipedia; US law is based on English Common Law and the only reference to that is at the bottom (below the "see also" header as well!!) and the first sentence includes a statement about the most comprehensive ones being in countries like Britain but even in this sentence, in this pathetic bit at the bottom, under the "See Also" header, in a section titled "Foreign Libararies" which is tiny compared the the one for the US, there is still a reference in parentheses to US law libraries. Lol, unbelievable. Never saw such a skewed page on this site since I started editing back in 2005. I suggest some work needs to be done here... ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ (Ταλκ ) 00:36, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Law library
Impact of law library 41.190.2.181 (talk) 06:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Article on biochemistry
I want all the article of biochemistry and how the field is. 105.112.188.0 (talk) 12:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)