Talk:Lawrencium/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parcly Taxel (talk · contribs) 09:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Once this goes to GA, we'll have an actinide GT. Parcly  Taxel  09:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Lead History Characteristics -> Chemical Atomic Parcly  Taxel  09:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "Twelve isotopes of lawrencium are currently known: the most stable is 266Lr with a half-life of 11 hours; but the shorter-lived 260Lr (half-life 2.7 minutes) is most commonly used in chemistry because it can be produced on a larger scale." Colon should be a semicolon, semicolon should be a comma.
 * ✅ Double sharp (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "Eighteen tracks were noted, with decay energy around (9 ± 1) MeV and half-life around 1⁄4 s; the Berkeley team noted that while the cause could be the production of an isotope of element 103, other possibilities could not be ruled out."
 * ✅ Double sharp (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "It has been speculated that the 7s electrons would be are relativistically stabilized, so that in reducing conditions, only the 7p1/2 or 6d electron would be ionized, leading to the monovalent Lr+ ion."
 * ✅ Double sharp (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "If the s2p configuration is correct, then lawrencium could not cannot be regarded as a transition metal under the IUPAC definition ("An element whose atom has an incomplete d sub-shell, or which can give rise to cations with an incomplete d sub-shell."), …"
 * ✅ Double sharp (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)