Talk:Laxman Narasimhan

Relevance of egg question
I dont see how the 2015 cage-free egg commitment that Starbucks has walked back is relevant to an article on the new CEO who just came to Starbucks in September 2022. Can you edit to include facts that tie it together? 47.153.64.236 (talk) 15:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Narasimhan was not even at Reckitt when the "Criticisms and controversies" happened
The two scandals were at Reckitt's South Korean unit and happened in 2011 and in 2014 (per the citation ). Narasimhan wasn't even at Reckitt until September 2019. Vaughnsy (talk) 01:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and removed that subsection since no one has objected. The resignation subsection also appears to make no sense either. It wasn't a controversy; per the citation he wanted to move back to the U.S. with his family, and the Starbucks offer gave him that opportunity. Also, per the citation in the rest of the article, Schultz apparently wanted him to start as soon as possible because Starbucks effectively had no CEO at that point (only Schultz as interim CEO). I am going to go ahead and remove that subsection as well. Vaughnsy (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)