Talk:Lazarus Powell

GA review
Even though this talk page didn't have the GA nominee on it, it was nominated for GA at WP:GAN. I've decided to fail the nomination because the body of the text appears to have lots of potential, but it only contains very short paragraphs of 2 or 3 lines. To me, this gives the impression much more can be said here, and thus fails to address the major aspects of the topic in a sufficient way. If these are expanded, I'll be happy to take another look. Er rab ee 01:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Good article
This article reads well and meets all the GA criteria. I particularly liked the extended lead section. Wish you well with your editing... Johnfos 20:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)