Talk:Le Puy-en-Velay

Distracting blank spaces
Formatting that encases the framed table of contents in text, in just the way a framed map or image is enclosed within the text, is now available: in the HTML does the job.

Blank space opposite the ToC, besides being unsightly and distracting, suggests that there is a major break in the continuity of the text, which may not be the case. Blanks in page layout are voids and they have meanings to the experienced reader. The space betweeen paragraphs marks a brief pause between separate blocks of thought. A deeper space, in a well-printed text, signifies a more complete shift in thought: note the spaces that separate sub-headings in Wikipedia articles.

A handful of thoughtless and aggressive Wikipedians revert the "TOCleft" format at will. A particularly aggressive de-formatter is User:Ed g2s

The reader may want to compare: --Wetman 19:42, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Formatted version
 * Version with a meaningless void

Missing word(s)
There is a word or phrase missing from the second paragraph of the architecture section: "The striking parti-colored [ missing word ] is connected to ..." Athænara ✉ 17:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Tempest Anderson images
Hi all, PatHadley here. I'm the Wikipedian-in-Residence at York Museums Trust (project pages). We're just getting started with a major upload of lantern slides by Tempest Anderson, a pioneering vulcanologist based in York. The image category is here: Category:Images from the Tempest Anderson Collection. It needs a little tidying but already has some great images of Le-Puy-en-Velay and the surrounding areas. They were taken on a trip around 1885. There will be more than 300 images coming soon (hopefully at higher resolutions!). If you have any questions please let me know. I hope you find them useful! Cheers, PatHadley (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Tonbridge
- re your removal of the Tonbridge template with the comment "not relevant here" - I contend that as the twin town of Tonbridge, the template is relevant here. It's been on this article a long time now without previous challenge. Surely that shows that it is relevant? If there was a Le Puy template, I'd expect it to be on the Tonbridge article. Please reconsider your removal. Mjroots (talk) 19:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * That it may have been here a long time is not a valid argument. Sister cities are themselves a minor point and including this much in reference to a sister city is completely out of proportion to Tonbridge's relevance to Le-Puy-en-Velay. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Le Puy-en-Velay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.droit.u-clermont1.fr/.../LeCentredEtudesRomanistiquesDAuvergne/GERHMA/92LaPaixpopulaire.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711120727/http://www.gr70-stevenson.com/en/stevenson-trail.htm to http://www.gr70-stevenson.com/en/stevenson-trail.htm
 * Added archive https://archive.is/19980610133900/http://www.logipro.com/velay/culture/index.htm to http://www.logipro.com/velay/culture/index.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050510232613/http://33.1911encyclopedia.org/L/LE/LE_PUY.htm to http://33.1911encyclopedia.org/L/LE/LE_PUY.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

"Lu/lə ˈpœj də ˈvəlaj" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lu/lə ˈpœj də ˈvəlaj. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 06:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)