Talk:Lead (band)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DMT biscuit (talk) 11:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

From my judgement, this article has multiple problems that mean its review fails automatically. The problem mainly lies with the sources, the vast majority being primary: blogs and e-commerce sites. Although the latter is permitted in small sections "to verify such things as titles and running times. Journalistic and academic sources are preferable, however, and e-commerce links should be replaced with reliable non-commercial sources if available". Their large presence in the article indicating a lack of reliable high-quality sources reporting on them, thus failing GA criteria and perhaps English Wikipedia notability—foreign language sources are permitted on English Wikipedia but them being the only sources perhaps says that they are not notable within the scope of this particular, instead of a more relevant one such as Japanese Wikipedia. Blogs are "generally unacceptable". What the article needs is more citations such as [31] and [49].

There are also multiple instances of uncited prose.

With all this taken into consideration, the article is going to be failed by me. If you believe that you did not receive an adequate review, you may ask for additional input on the discussion page.