Talk:Leaders of Quraish

Anyone agreeing that this aritcle does not deserve the "context" tag? --Striver 17:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, and not to give you a hard time, but I do think it does still need it. Frankly, I think the article would benefit from being merged into Quraish where it would be given sufficient context. Esquizombi 18:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I appreciated your input and do not view it as only trying to give me a hard time. Could you elaborate on what parts of the article that are hard to grasp for those unfamilar with the subject, so i can address it? Thanks for your time, and peace --Striver 21:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, as I wrote above I think merging into the Quraish article would help give it some of the context it needs. I'll tag it for a proposed merge into that, but I won't actually merge it.  Some of the questions that could stand to be answered are: were the leaders appointed or were they hereditary, what responsibilities did they have as leaders, did they have certain titles, and so on.  Since there's only a few listed, it might make sense for them to appear in the paragraph rather than list form. Esquizombi 05:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I am fine with the merge, if the list get's large we can move it here again. -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 15:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)