Talk:League of Legends/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 12:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have to give this article a quick fail. The lead is too short, the development is almost completly unreferenced, and most of the article is about the gameplay.


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Some sections should be written as prose and it does not follow the Manual of Style
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No references in the "Development" section, recognised as "OR"
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Fix development, as stated above.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * Seems pretty good.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Other than the boxart, there is nothing. No image of the developers, maybe a screenshot...nothing.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As you can see, this article will need A LOT of work before it can pass. Good luck! --Khanassassin (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Things to do

 * The lead - The lead should contain a little of everything. The gameplay, story, development, release, reception...
 * Gameplay - The section should be a bit shortened, since most of the article is about the gameplay. I also spoted a "" in there.
 * Story - A section dedicated to the story, if the game has one.
 * Development and Distribution - The development section really needs lots of references, and a few could be added the Distribution section
 * Reception - The award table should probably be converted to prose