Talk:Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 01:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 07:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Heartfox (talk) 07:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * "as "a catastrophe" → quotes in lead require inline citation per WP:LEADCITE
 * Reworded, as I don't enjoy having to include citations in the lead.
 * "was almost immediately felt" → informal
 * Rephrased to "'BTSTU' also had an impact on contemporary pop music" - if a different phrasing is better here let me know
 * "noted", "however" → WP:WTW
 * Removed "noted", though I'm not sure of which "however" you're referring to here
 * "Some publications refrained from reviewing the 2013 bootleg", " but critics who did choose to make note of it offered mostly positive opinions" → only one publication is cited to support each of these statements, but they are written as plural?
 * You're right. I've removed this sentence altogether.
 * many of the genres stated in infobox are not supported in body
 * Changed to just pop, R&B and electronic
 * Stephen ref missing magazine name
 * Fixed.
 * Can you get a timestamp for the Masa interview?
 * Unfortunately, I think the only audible proof that this quote is even legitimate comes from this clip on Soundcloud. I couldn't find any archives of Zane Lowe's interviews anywhere.
 * Not sure where DeVille supports that the album was released by XL
 * Added the Pitchfork review to supplement this.
 * Thank you for the review, Heartfox! This is one of the earlier works that I've done, and I'm realizing that it's in a bit of a shoddier state than I'd hoped. Looking forward to your further comments. joeyquism (talk ) 13:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Heartfox, is there more to come on this? joeyquism (talk ) 16:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * How do the genres in the infobox meet WP:EXPLICITGENRE? Heartfox (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Pitchfork labels the album as pop and R&B in their review of the album here. I've since removed the electronic label as there aren't any direct mentions of an electronic label that I can find. I apologize for these errors. joeyquism (talk ) 07:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, passed. If you are able to leave comments at my current FAC that would be great! Best, Heartfox (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, Heartfox. I very much appreciate your consideration, but unfortunately I cannot promise a review at this time as I am planning to take an extended wikibreak after completing my own FAC and have tried to cut back on my contributions in the meantime. While I may eventually have the opportunity to review your nomination, I cannot make any guarantees at this moment. I hope you understand, and I wish you the best with your nomination. joeyquism (talk ) 21:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)