Talk:Leal Garcia v. Texas

Unclear sentence in the lead
What does "The Court did not stay the execution because it held that Congress but enact legislation in order for international law to apply" mean? It seems that some words may have been accidentally deleted. -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 06:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Whoops! It should say "must enact legislation". I've made the modification. What do you think about the clarity now? Sailing to Byzantium (talk) 07:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Neutrallity Tag - POV
There are a couple of issues. First, the case presents only Garcia's arguments and does not present any of the arguments of the State of Texas. Second, the references listed likewise only present Garcia's POV. Information on the State's position, although readily available, is omitted. GregJackP  Boomer!   05:44, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree that the fact that the article lacks the State's arguments is a POV issue (though I am too busy IRL to correct this now). -- Sailing to Byzantium  ( msg ),  05:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * To add, I think you could expedite the process of correcting this issue by providing the sources you say are readily available. -- Sailing to Byzantium  ( msg ),  05:59, 20 May 2012 (UTC)