Talk:Lebanon/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Reaper Eternal (talk · contribs) 13:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I looked at the article, and, to be frank, it looks pretty bad. Please source everything, and then I will re-look at the article. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that you haven't even edited the article! What was the purpose of this nomination? Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll start sourcing everything. And about your second question, I didn't see any rule that said I needed to have edited the article before. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You might want to put it on hold. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Why did you nominate this now? This is practically quick-fail material. Do the work beforehand and get it up to a reasonable state, then nominate it. To point out a few things to work on: manual of style, prose, grammar (just a quick note: "Christian holidays are celebrated following both the Gregorian Calender and Julian Calender" *Calendar), references (as stated by Reaper above) but the main problem here is completion! Good articles boast some of the best material on Wikipedia, and since Lebanon is one of the most important topics available, we need it to be complete in all aspects, some sections here are only a sentence long. This needs a lot of work. Oh and sorry to butt in on your review, Reaper Eternal. Aranea Mortem (talk to me) 05:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Additionally, this should be listed under "Places" not "Geography". Geography mainly entails general landforms. Aranea Mortem (talk to me) 05:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok. Fail it. I'll renominate it when everything is done. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)