Talk:Lecture Circuit/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: liquidluck ✽ talk  00:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Other than a few easy-to-fix typos the content looks good, so I only have a few quick concerns:
 * What makes these reliable?
 * http://www.officetally.com/parks-and-recreation-set-visit/2
 * http://www.officetally.com/the-office-highest-rated-episodes-season-5
 * http://www.givememyremote.com/remote/2009/02/12/the-office-lecture-circuit-part-ii/


 * Since Give Me the Remote was only being used to back up a statement that had three other references anyway, I've dropped that one altogether. As far as OfficeTally, that one has been discussed before, most recently at the Parks and Recreation (season 1) FAC. Although a fansite, the person who runs it (Jennie Tan) has been doing s for so long and efficiently that she has been given an unprecedented amount of access to the producers and to show information, to the extent that she has been given behind-the-scenes access to The Office. There have been plenty of reliable sources that have written about it (this, this, this, this and this) that demonstrate it's reliability. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Thanks! liquidluck ✽ talk  03:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Write citations in standard casing (not all uppercase)
 * Sorry, I'm not sure waht this refers to? —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It referred to the Give me the Remote site, but that's since been deleted. liquidluck ✽ talk  03:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Is Dan Goor notable? If not, delink.
 * Delinked. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Choose either Late Night with Conan O'Brien or Parks and Recreation for Goor's description. If Parks is more related to The Office, choose that, if not, choose Conan.
 * Dropped Conan, since Parks is much more related to The Office than Conan is. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The picture caption says Kalin wrote Lecture Circuit, though the body says she directed it.
 * Unless I'm missing it somewhere, I don't see anything that says she directed. In any event, it should be written, not directed. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Reception says "heavily criticized by viewers and reveiwers", but I couldn't find viewer reception in the references. Can you point the right ref?
 * You're right. Dropped the "by viewers" part. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Putting the article on hold until April 7; these shouldn't be too hard to fix. Nice work! liquidluck ✽ talk 00:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Result
 * Thanks for the review! —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass. liquidluck ✽ talk  03:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)