Talk:Lee Lozano

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 21 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kellychen927.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
I'm looking for someone to provide feedback on this new, unreviewed article. Many thanks! NaomiTal (talk) 04:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Requested review
Pretty good shape, for a start-class article. Here are areas for improvement:
 * Lead paragraph - should be longer, and summarize the high points to follow in the article, without citation, per WP:MOS.
 * Article length: for an artist who has been broadly documented, it seems the article could be longer. In my opinion it stands as Start class.
 * Article sections: seems like there should be more than just the bio. It could benefit from Early life, Education, and significant artistic periods.  A few sentences about her  notebooks would add depth.
 * Long quotes should be visually isolated, perhaps with "..." or the or  or   templates . See CAT:QUOTE for links to instructions, guidelines, and a whole lot of quotation templates.
 * Tone: any praise or criticism, or adjectives about her work, even seemingly neutral words such as "culminating" should be sourced, or other words used, so that it doesn't read as an endorsement or criticism by Wikipedia itself. See WP:PUFFERY.
 * Reviews/reception would be a good section to add, especially reviews of shows noted in the press.
 * Sources: The following 3 references should cite the original source more closely and note the PDF as an archive, hosted at the art gallery's website. The PDFs do preserve the published format closely which is nice, but copyright and permanence are issues to be considered.  We may presume, assuming good faith, that the gallery had/has permission to host a copy of the article, but the PDF should not be considered the first source or only source. If possible, the publication's volume and issue should be noted, in case the website or PDF version is no longer accessible, and where possible, a DOI or or ISSN or ISBN number should be noted.
 * Frieze article : http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/on_e/.
 * Brooklyn Rail article: http://www.brooklynrail.org/2008/11/artseen/brooklyn-dispatches-resurrection-of-a-bad-ass-girl-part-i
 * Art Forum article : http://artforum.com/inprint/id=1701 and note that free registration is required with the  template prior to

--Lexein (talk) 09:23, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The Bibliography section duplicates the inline references, and should not. Also, sources not directly cited could be listed in a Further Reading section. See WP:Further reading for guidance, and see San Francisco for a prime example of good use of Further Reading.
 * URL links should be shown like this as text not like this as a bare URL: http://example.com
 * Per WP:VERIFY sources should be verifiable. To me, that includes seeking notable reliable online sources wherever possible, including Google Books. But that's just me.
 * Categories: Please add specific-area Categorization templates wherever possible: female artists, New York artists, etc. See articles about similar artists for examples.

Need info
Does anyone know how much grass this women smoked normally before her 'Grass/No Grass' work?

I'm considering, as Ms Lozano did, a Masturbation Investigation to be done for a period of a 5 years at home. Does anyone know where I can get some funding for this project for my living expenses while I do this research? 47.232.145.208 (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)