Talk:Lee Spetner

Changes needed
I recently added two template messages (rewrite and add references) due to the poor quality of the article. I improved the basic writing by trying to add an element of objectivity and neutrality, considering that the previous version was written in the tone of a fan or admirer. Still, the quick rewrite features the information given in the previous version, so references are still a priority. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.79.65.232 (talk) 09:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Spetner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.worldscibooks.com/etextbook/6998/6998_biograhies.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725094302/http://www.borhatorah.org/editions/14/bio-spetner.htm to http://www.borhatorah.org/editions/14/bio-spetner.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:45, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Common descent
This article states that Spetner claims that there is no scientific evidence for common descent. However, on p.132 of his book, “Not by Chance!”, he writes of Robert Williams and his colleagues that, “…they found a species of cat that has descended from the same ancestor, and has not changed much since.” I’ve read sections of this book, and have not encountered a denial of evolution or of common descent. 2A02:14F:1EF:C634:C113:4711:AA7:66C8 (talk) 23:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)