Talk:Left-brain interpreter

January 2014
misleading reference ' Although the concept of the left brain interpreter was initially based on experiments on patients with split brains, it has since been shown to apply to the everyday behavior of people at large.[3] ' This wording leads the reader to believe that reference 3 would contain some evidence that is not based on patients with split brains. However, the quoted page of the book is exactly the same statement (that this research applies to the everyday behaviour of people at large), which is a quote by a friend of Gazzaniga (the scientist studying split-brains). I am writing an essay about interpretative mechanisms in the brain and I have done some research in the field; I have found no direct evidence pointing to the left brain interpreting apart from split brain patients (which is some pretty good evidence, but the opposite should not be stated). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.52.24.17 (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
"cite a source" The section that states different regions are categorized according to different "levels" of explanation does not cite any source for that assertion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.187.47.224 (talk) 04:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Ideomotor phenomenon
Ideomotor phenomenon links to this page in the "see also" section. I don't quite understand the relation. Should the link be removed, or should an explanation be added to one or both pages by a subject matter expert?

Another note about this page, it seems like it is missing a criticism section. 184.67.135.194 (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)