Talk:Left Front (West Bengal)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Left Front (West Bengal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718185438/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1977/Vol_I_LS_77.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1977/Vol_I_LS_77.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718175926/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1980/Vol_I_LS_80.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1980/Vol_I_LS_80.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718184911/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183934/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183558/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718181833/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183222/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140811090059/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/25_ConstituencyWiseDetailedResult.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/25_ConstituencyWiseDetailedResult.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Left Front (West Bengal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050907120307/http://www.eci.gov.in/ElectionAnalysis/GE/PartyCompWinner/S25/partycomp23.htm to http://www.eci.gov.in/electionanalysis/GE/PartyCompWinner/S25/partycomp23.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

"Left Front (India)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Left Front (India). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 03:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 14 November 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior  16:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

– I believe this article is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Of the 7 articles actually called "Left Front", this one gets more pageviews than |Left_Front_(France)|Left_Front_(Russia)|Left_Front_(Catalonia)|Left_Front_(West_Bengal)|Left_Front_(Tripura)|Left_Front_(magazine) the rest combined, and has done for |Left_Front_(France)|Left_Front_(Russia)|Left_Front_(Catalonia)|Left_Front_(West_Bengal)|Left_Front_(Tripura)|Left_Front_(magazine) a long time. With regards to long-term significance, none of the other Left Fronts are nearly as significant as the alliance that governed India's fourth-largest state for so long it became synonymous with the government of the region. YttriumShrew (talk) 00:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Left Front (West Bengal) → Left Front
 * Left Front → Left Front (disambiguation)
 * Oppose. Too many to make a primary topic likely. This would have to be overwhelmingly the primary topic, and I really don't think it is. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * With regards to usage, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC requires it only to be much more used than any other, and more used than all others together.


 * Here's the pageviews data as of this post:


 * For what it's worth, I also used the Google unpersonalised search and all but one of the first-page results was about the WB Left Front; the other was the WP disambiguation page. link


 * With regards to long-term significance:

To me, the West Bengal Left Front is much more significant than any other Left Front, and deserves WP:PRIMARYTOPIC status. YttriumShrew (talk) 17:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The data above is not particularly informative. It merely proves that a lot of people live in West Bengal. Would it be recognizable to people outside of West Bengal? Walrasiad (talk) 07:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Precisely. Page views rather reflect population. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I may be wrong, but isn't this the argument that WP:NWFCTM makes clear isn't relevant? YttriumShrew (talk) 20:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * No. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * oppose per the comments above. we have to use our own logic as well. the facts provided, only show the number of population. If we perform the moves as requested, that would give us a lot of confused readers, including 63,745 french people. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 14:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)