Talk:Legality of the Israeli occupation of Palestine

Slightly confusing title
Shouldn't this be 'Legality of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Territories' or 'Legality of the Israeli occupation of the State of Palestine', to avoid confusion with Palestine (region). Most of the sources still appear to use 'Palestinian Territories', which I feel isn't the best wording. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 15:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Certainly there is a technical argument, we also have International Criminal Court investigation in Palestine where the court describes the case as the "Situation in the State of Palestine", and Legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory including East Jerusalem (same as ICJ calls it). Just as a title, Idk that it is really that confusing and it is linked out to Pt in the first sentence, I can't see that interested parties are going to misconstrue the title as referring to historical Palestine rather than the current version. In reality, Pt = oPt = (territory claimed by) SoP, the majority of newsorgs continue for historical reasons to use Pt while the UN and other sources tend to use oPt/OPT, few use Palestine as yet. If there were to be a change, then I prefer SoP. Selfstudier (talk) 16:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Maybe I'm just being a bit slow today. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 17:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Cloudfront prevents archiving of pdf
The ruling is in a pdf at https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf but it seems that Cloudflare prevents the pdf from being archived by the Wayback Machine. Boud (talk) 18:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)