Talk:Legality of the War on Drugs

Untitled
At http://www.indymedia.org/en/2011/05/948461.shtml is an article claiming that "The reversal of the onus of proof in drug-possession cases is incompatible with the rule of law and is therefore automatically and irredeemably unconstitutional in all jurisdictions." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.158.2 (talk) 23:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

The link in (as of this posting) citation 7 is dead: http://atlanta.indymedia.org/local/universally-unconstitutional-war-drugs-3rd-ed. The above link (http://www.indymedia.org/en/2011/05/948461.shtml) is currently active. Recommend an update. Rlorenr (talk) 19:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Intent to nominate this page for deletion
It sounds like an non notable interpretation of a non notable book. Lulaq (talk) 19:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Why is the dissenting view cited
Why is the dissenting view cited as justification of the illegality of the war on drugs? Isn't the dissenting view the losing side of the equation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kielvon (talk • contribs) 14:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Merge into War on Drugs
No reason this doesn't fit under the subject of War on Drugs.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legality of the War on Drugs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150217035034/http://www.redlichlaw.com/crim/substantive-due-process-drug-war.pdf to http://www.redlichlaw.com/crim/substantive-due-process-drug-war.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)