Talk:Leges Edwardi Confessoris

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leges Edwardi Confessoris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100815214008/http://www.gale.cengage.com/DigitalCollections/products/ModernEconomy/index.htm to http://www.gale.cengage.com/DigitalCollections/products/ModernEconomy/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Is this pseudohistorical?
I've been editing the article about the Anti-Secession Act of 1861, a pseudohistorical U.S. law introduced by China, and another user has proposed that the Leges Edwardi Confessoris (LEC) is comparable. English history is not my strong suit! Is there consensus that the LEC is also pseudohistory? At a glance, it seems like a fair description. Carguychris (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)