Talk:Legitimate expectation in Singapore law/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 17:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Review
Let's start the review, I know its been a long time waiting. I am no expert on Singapore's laws and courts, but I'm going to give this a shot.

My major concern comes from the lengthy section detailing the UK rather then Singapore. This seems to be largely off-topic. Also, much of the source material I cannot acquire or view, thus I cannot validate a good portion of the claims. Is there anything that can be done to address this matter? This is a situation in which I would have to go on limited information. Any additional comments and information would be beneficial and appreciated. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing the article. Here are my responses:
 * 2a: I don't think reliable online sources are available for this law topic. I think you will just have to assume good faith for the offline sources.
 * 3b: Singapore administrative law is largely based on UK administrative law, so discussion of the UK legal position is relevant to Singapore.
 * 6: Which images do you think are off-topic, and why? I don't think any of them are off-topic.
 * — SMUconlaw (talk) 02:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I was just looking for a good reason in which to quash my concerns. I'm no expert on Singaporean law. The matter of the images was by extension, if the UK section was off-topic (I see it is necessary for context, but was a bit overly detailed for my liking) then the pictures would be off topic. Though I have found nothing of concern. So I will pass this. It is a good article. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, glad I could help. Thanks very much! — SMUconlaw (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)