Talk:Lego Island/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 17:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this GAN as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 5.7% in similarity.
 * There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
 * The article is stable. There has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
 * No previous GA reviews. References for improving the article are listed on the talk page so I'll look at which have been implemented in the article.
 * There are four references left on the talk page that could be possibly added to the article. This is, of course, optional, so it is not a requirement in order for this article to be promoted to GA status.

General comments

 * Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
 * No problems were found in the lede.
 * No problems were found in the rest of the article.
 * Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
 * Add alt texts to the images in the article.
 * FYI, you can remove the single citation from the lede. I doubt that it is something that is likely to be challenged by someone and the information is already mentioned in the body. Lede meets the rest of the WP:LEAD guideline.
 * Howard Gardner and theory of multiple intelligences are wikilinked twice in the body. The second mention in the "Development and release" section could be unlinked.
 * The article also complies with the MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. There are no embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED.
 * Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
 * References section with a template is present in the article.
 * No referencing issues.
 * Most of the references are reliable, however:
 * Per WP:RSPYT: The refs in this case come from unverified and anonymous channels, therefore the refs should be removed and replaced with a reliable source (if there is one that backs that sentence up).
 * That's a tougher one, since the staff confirmed the ending was changed for that reason when asked about it and one of the two citations is the original cut, but since I couldn't find it listed in a better source, I pulled the sentence.
 * You can add the URL to the instruction manual: Internet Archive.
 * Ref 7 and 39 do not have pages listed.
 * Spotchecked Ref 2, 4, 7, 13, 21, 25, 32, 40–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
 * I do not see Bill Ding being mentioned in Ref 7 and 10.
 * Copyvio already checked.
 * Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
 * The article addresses the main aspects and it stays focused on the topic. The only thing I still do not get is why is Jenkins' death mentioned in the article.
 * Yeah, me either. Removed.
 * Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
 * The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
 * Checking whether the article is stable.
 * As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
 * Checking images.
 * All looks good, images are properly licensed.
 * Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
 * The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
 * Checking whether the article is stable.
 * As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
 * Checking images.
 * All looks good, images are properly licensed.

Final comments
The article will be put on hold for a week so that you can fix these issues that I've pointed out in the review. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Think I got everything, but if I missed something, please let me know! -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 22:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * All issues have been addressed so I'll promote the article to GA status. Good job. Vacant0 (talk) 10:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC)