Talk:Leigh Sales

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leigh Sales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607041851/http://www.mup.unimelb.edu.au/catalogue/0-522-85400-1.html to http://www.mup.unimelb.edu.au/catalogue/0-522-85400-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Detainee 002
Detainee 002 article needs to be merged to Leigh Sales — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:B910:3D00:405E:421C:7EE3:112 (talk) 06:19, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Thought-provoking book?
I think that it is probably quite valid to describe Sales' third book as "thought-provoking", nevertheless this is an opinion, and I just wonder whether it would be better simply to stick to the facts, in accordance with the encyclopedic mandate of Wikipedia. "Thought-provoking" also makes the article sound just a little hagiographic. Any thoughts from other Editors? Research17 (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No question, that epithet ought to be removed. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Michael Bednarek. Thanks for that. I've just deleted. Research17 (talk) 11:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)