Talk:Lemington Power Station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk)  20:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Some comments: I fixed everything except ref 6, which needs a new url (or archive link). Otherwise it will pass through GA. Arsenikk (talk)  20:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * First instance of acronyms, even "UK", is spelled out.
 * Don't need to link Newcastle two times so close, same with a few other links. See WP:OVERCAT
 * It is a bit redundant to, in a reference, first put in the url, then another link to the cite and then the name of the publisher. The first and last are sufficient.
 * Publishers are proper nouns and therefore always capitalized.
 * Ref 6 redirects to the main page of the site.


 * Reference 6 has now been archived. Is there anything else? Fintan264 (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I hate to be strict on this, but the archiveurl needs to point to an actual archive site. When I search as archive.org, it says this site is not archived due to limitations in robots.txt (meaning the site has not allowed other sites to crawl it). You will probably have to find it in another news source or alternatively ref to the paper addition. Arsenikk (talk)  21:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have moved from cite web to cite news as the original now broken link took the information from a published news paper. Fintan264 (talk) 23:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Then it is approved. Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk)  10:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)