Talk:Lemon of Troy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Lead
 * I would suggest writing out RV in full first time it is used. I appreciate it's wikilinked but for a simple edit which wouldn't tempt people to click away from the page, I think it's a simple change to make.

It's only one minor point, so I will leave it up to you to change, and I will pass the article. Another good read and well-structured. Meets all the GA criteria. Well done.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Peanut4 (talk) 13:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Peanut4 (talk) 13:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Peanut4 (talk) 13:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. Thanks for reviewing! -- The Le ft orium  13:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)