Talk:Lemonade, Inc.

This entire article reads like a PR piece and links directly to the company's page. The stats listed are extremely misleading and not standard metrics for the industry. The company has not gain much market share yet and is struggling for viability with only about $500k in earned premium since inception which is a financial unfeasibly low number for this industry. Please include plain facts and not cherry picked marketing numbers from unofficial sources.

This article continues to be edited to be a biased marketing piece without links to impartial sources.

This is basically a marketing article for Lemonade - editors? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:240:C801:A48C:7539:7207:E637:C3EC (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

I agree with you, and added the advertising tag. I looked at the article's edit history and it seems unfavorable information that is added about the company ends up being being reverted/challenged. Hopefully more experienced editors will investigate for a potential conflict of interest. The article's focus on social good and presentation of the company as revolutionary seems like flowery PR. It is an insurance company at the end of the day with a sleek mobile app, not a charity. 2601:782:400:9E4A:C44E:D5F7:9F9C:43D (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 2601:782:400:9E4A:C44E:D5F7:9F9C:43D I made some edits to the article. Removed a ton of marketing content, rewording to give it the neutral point of view. Do you think we are ready to remove the advertising tag? אגם רפאלי (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)