Talk:Lemuria and Easter Island

ok. well i've given myself until the end of the week to make this article suitable and to sort it out. any help would be appreciated. cheers dan --Danbrown99 21:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

finished before expected. enjoy --Danbrown99 20:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

article should be revised
This article should not be presented as is. The entire first paragraph has very little to do with either Lemuria or Easter Island and is, in fact a tirade of the author against any and all "fringe" archaeology. We should not be able to tell what the author's (thinly veiled) opinion is by reading this entry. The repeated insistence of the author about the manipulation of evidence has little to do with the subject and distracts from the purpose of the article. Those comments should be reserved for a discussion on 'pseudoarchaeology'.

This article should be presented as legend and mythology to maintain an unbiased tone. All mention of the 'definition' and shortcomings of 'pseudorarchaeology' should be erased. Anataria 16:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

This whole article needs to be scrapped and written from scratch. It's so full of bias and opinion that I don't think you could fix it.