Talk:Lendico

Unjustified deletion of content
I would like to discuss the content that have been deleted by JzG talk from this article as it does not reflect a self sourced material. JzG talk, could you please elaborate on your argumentation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Q.leroy (talk • contribs) 12:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

2013Ca55 Could you explain me why you deleted valid part of Lendico article? The reference to the Welt for example? This newspaper is the equivalent of the NewYork Times in Germany and therefore following WP policy for reliability and notability. Another important point: I wrote this articles during my studies after doing a research on peer to peer lending. If you research a little more, you will see that I also participated in the creation and improvement of other articles concerning peer-to-peer lending companies. This is just to say that Lendico is certainly not a Wikipedia’s Dubious Ad Company Entries as you implies it. Q.leroy (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

I am open to discuss any POI related to my user account. JzG talk, please elaborate. Q.leroy (talk) 08:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. The removals are not "unjustified", as I justified them in the edit summaries. Guy (Help!) 15:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)