Talk:Lenyadri/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! 03:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I am ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! and I am a member of WikiProject Buddhism. I'll be reviewing this GA nomination. Should be done in a couple hours (or so). ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 03:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * To begin, nice article. I am enjoying reviewing it. The prose needs a little polishing, but I'm doing that myself as I go, so don't worry about it. The first paragraph under "Cave 7" has a tag, because you need to put the reference directly after the quote. Please correct that. I'll continue to review it.  ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! 03:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the copyediting. Ref moved. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 13:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * This line, under the chapels section: "Behind the relic-shrine, in a curve, are six eight-sided pillars." I'm not sure what you mean by "in a curve." If you can explain it to me here, I'll edit the article for you. Also, you use the term "corbelled" a couple times, and I don't know what that means. Can you explain that as well? Thanks. I'm almost done with the copyedit, by the way. ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! 06:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I hope the new line helps. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 13:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * In Cave 15, you say "unproved doorway." What does this mean? In Cave 16, you say "Cave 16 is a small dwelling, slightly higher above cave 15." When you say this, do you mean the ceiling was higher? Or do you mean cave 16 is above cave 15? If cave 16 is above, how is it reached? Stairs? A ladder? ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! 07:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The reference calls it "unproved". "The cell is 7' 11" broad 7 9" deep and 7 high with an unproved doorway 2' 7" wide and 6' 2" high.". The word can be dropped, if it is a problem as even I do not know the clear meaning. Reworded Cave 16 sentence. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 13:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay, the copyediting is done. It looks good. One thing I want to get your opinion on, before I make a decision: Do you think the detail about the ordinary numbered caves is necessary? I mean the ones that just have a bench and a cell, and stuff like that? Because I think the article would be just as strong if only the notable caves were described in detail. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The WP:FA? wants comprehensiveness. If I remove that, comprehensiveness will be compromised. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 14:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Good work! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 15:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)