Talk:Leon S. Kennedy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Matthewrbowker (talk · contribs) 20:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

First of all, this is my first review, so bear with me.

I found this article to be very complete. I haven't had any exposure with the Resident Evil series, but this article was thorough enough that I was able to understand the subject matter thoroughly. The sources supported the statements made in the article.

I've cross-checked all of the Good Article criteria, and I feel the article passes.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Thanks. A related GA nominee article is Ada Wong. --Niemti (talk) 22:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)