Talk:Leonard L. Northrup Jr.

Untitled
Most edits made as suggested. Thanks. Rest under way. Some related issues - search "Northrup" redirects to "Northrop Aircraft"

[[User:northrup49/james northrup] 23 Feb 2010

NPOV is established by the additional references, quotes and citations

Lead Section has been added

14 new references added

[User:northrup49/james northrup] 28 Feb 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Northrup49 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link added, general references, and a quote from Architectural Digest and reference added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Northrupr (talk • contribs) 23:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Removed reference to myself for NPOV

Northrup49}} --[[User:Northrup49|Northrup49 (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

A Lead Section was added last month - need to remove that edit -- (james northrup) 13:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Lead Section, Refimprove flags have been removed. I would like to format the references better, but I don't think the flag needs to stay up. Wikitaco444 (talk) 19:31, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Connection to Subject Matter
The subject is indeed notable, and the article of interest. While one must be especially careful in BOLP this article does aim at the requisite NPOV, verified outside cites, and properly avoids independent research (like remarks from Aunt Tilda's unpublished diary). Wikipedia conributers can never entirely avoid a personal connection or at least some interest in the subject, or they would know nothing of the topic and wouldn't trouble to contribute. I think so long as continued careful attention is paid to citing recognized sources, and avoiding hagiography, this one passes muster.ElijahBosley (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Cleanup Questions
Hi, do we think these article issues are improved to the point I could remove these tags: refimprove, intromissing, and wikify? If not, any suggestions would be fabulous. Wikitaco444 (talk) 18:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Intromissing you could certainly remove. I am not sure what wikify really means or what more the article could do in that respect. I tend to agree with refimprove though.  Perhaps after taking off Intromissing you might move the remainder of the  tag to this discussion page as an ongoing reminder, and then later take it down when you are confident all pertinent sources are cited.ElijahBosley (talk) 22:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)