Talk:Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc./Archives/2013

Untitled
No citation on the money coming from Leonard's lawyer. Not in the case. Not readily available from a google search. Consider revision? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.202.236.2 (talk) 17:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I added a citation needed tag. Rm999 (talk) 02:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The third external link mentions this. Rawling 4851 20:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Case provides that, "On or about March 27, 1996, plaintiff submitted an Order Form, fifteen original Pepsi Points, and a check for $700,008.50. (See Def. Stat. ¶ 36.) Plaintiff appears to have been represented by counsel at the time he mailed his check; the check is drawn on an account of plaintiff's first set of attorneys. Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc., 88 F. Supp. 2d 116, 119 - Dist. Court, SD New York 1999 ViveSomnium (talk) 14:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah, but I don't trust that last source. No other source for it, and that source was written after the "fact" was introduced to the Wikipedia article. Could have gotten it from here. Canterbury Tail   talk  16:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Geez, only in America. Glad I'm not an American taxpayer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.147.106 (talk) 09:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Settlement and Aftermath?
I have no authoritative source (currently), but I remember there was more to this story -- Pepsi gave the kid a sizeable scholarship, donated some money somewhere (possibly the $700K), and updated the Harrier's value to "7 BILLION PEPSI POINTS" or some similar. Anyone else remember this? Stands apart from mere trivia for the plaintiff's (apparent) 'gain,' and possible corporate precedent. I'll see what I can dig up. Sskoog (talk) 15:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)