Talk:Lepraria salazinica

Stub
Howdy Esculenta. What's your criteria for deciding when an article is a stub? Mine used to be 4 paragraphs or less. Then I notice you reverted me on something about a week ago so I changed it to 3 paragraphs or less. Now you reverted me on this one which is 3 paragraphs. Thanks. – Novem Linguae (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * You should familiarize yourself with WP:STUBDEF, particularly the Croughton-London rule of stubs. This is an uncommon species about which there is not a lot of literature, and not much more can be written. Esculenta (talk) 17:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * So stub status is determined by whether or not the article writer thinks it can be expanded further? That's surprisingly subjective. Noted though. I'll slow down on my species stub tagging. – Novem Linguae (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, the article writer typically has a better idea of the literature space associated with an article than drive-by article taggers, so it's much less subjective than you assert. Good idea to slow down the article tagging. Esculenta (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)